Blog
Explore anti-aging treatment insights and information personally written by the medical team at ODE CLINIC.
Top 4 Popular Posts
Lifting
Ultherapy vs. ONDA Lifting: Price, Effects, and Pain Compared
"Doctor, my jawline has gone blunt and saggy. Should I have Ultherapy, or ONDA?"I don't think a week goes by without that question.Search it and you mostly get "Ultherapy is stronger," which doesn't help much.What you actually want to know is which one fits your face.The similar pricing doesn't make it easier.In Gangnam, Ultherapy runs KRW 1,200,000–1,500,000 for 300 shots,and ONDA Lifting KRW 1,500,000–2,000,000 for three sessions of 100,000J.Both get recommended for the same areas too — jawline, double chin.But the two devices are doing very different jobs.Ultherapy contracts the SMAS layer with ultrasound.ONDA Lifting (ONDA Coolwaves) breaks down subcutaneous fat with microwaves.Different layers, different goals.Here's what several years of performing both in Gangnam has taught me.Written directly by Dr. Kim Do-hoon, Medical Director of ODE ClinicUltherapy vs ONDA Lifting: The Core DifferencesLet me put the conclusion in a table first.CategoryUltherapyONDA LiftingMechanismHigh-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)MicrowaveTarget layerSubcutaneous fat layer, SMAS layerConcentrated in the subcutaneous fat layerMain purposeContraction of sagging structures, liftingFat reduction, volume reductionRecommended areasJawline, double chinJawline, double chinPain (out of 10)7–8Around 3DowntimeSwelling for 1–2 weeksAlmost noneOnset of effectFrom 2 weeks up to 3 monthsGradually over 1 monthRecommended frequencyOnce every 6–12 months3 sessions at 1-month intervalsPrice300 shots, KRW 1,200,000–1,500,000100,000J × 3, KRW 1,500,000–2,000,000Read on its own, that table can make the two look interchangeable.Look closer, though, and the distinctions that actually decide the choice start to surface.I'll take them one at a time below.Ultherapy: Effects and MechanismDepth is what sets Ultherapy apart from everything else in the category.Through 3.0mm and 4.5mm cartridges, energy travels all the way down to the SMAS layer,which sits between the subcutaneous fat and the muscle.That's the same layer plastic surgeons pull upward during a facelift.The name itself is a compound — ultrasound plus therapy.In other words, a lifting device running on high-intensity focused ultrasound.Focus that energy on a single point and the temperature there climbs to roughly 60–70℃.A microscopic injury forms, known as a thermal coagulation point.Fibroblasts wake up around it, and new collagen follows.Not Lifted Up — Re-AdheredA lot of patients picture Ultherapy pulling tissue upward the way thread lifting does.The mechanism is different.What actually happens is that the sagging SMAS layer and fibrous septa contract,so tissue that had drooped re-adheres to where it originally sat.The limitations are just as real.Since the energy also passes through the subcutaneous fat layer,patients who had little cheek volume to start with can end up with hollowing.Lifted, but gaunt — that's the outcome nobody wants.Which is why deciding what to avoid, during the design stage, matters as much as deciding where to treat.ONDA Lifting: Effects and MechanismONDA goes after fat cells selectively.Microwaves are absorbed more readily by tissue holding few water molecules and plenty of lipids.So heat concentrates in the subcutaneous fat layer, the fat cell membrane takes damage, and cell death follows.The device itself runs microwaves in the 2.45GHz band.DEKA of Italy developed it, and it also goes by the name Coolwaves.One thing worth knowing: the broken-down fat doesn't vanish on the spot.It clears gradually through metabolic processes over roughly a month.That's why a photograph taken a month later shows more change than one taken right after the session.Thermal stimulation reaches the dermis at the same time, so some collagen regeneration comes along with it.Fat down, firmness up — both at once.Where ONDA Lifting Runs Out(1) Area selection isn't precise.The handpiece works in a rubbing motion, so selectively avoiding a spot like the anterior cheek— which can hollow out — is difficult.Narrow areas such as the nasolabial fold need caution too, since the surrounding region can lose volume.(2) One session usually isn't enough.Fat cell death scales with the number of sessions.Which is why three sessions at one-month intervals is the general recommendation.(3) It doesn't fix sagging itself.ONDA was never built to target the SMAS layer.The jawline gets tidied indirectly, as weight comes off.Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting: Pain and DowntimeThis is where the experience diverges most sharply.CategoryUltherapyONDA LiftingType of painDeep, sharp painA sensation of warmingPain intensity7–8 out of 10Around 3AnesthesiaTopical anesthetic, nerve blockMostly performed without anesthesiaSwellingMarked swelling for 1 week, residual swelling up to 2 weeksAlmost noneReturn to daily lifePossible same day, though swelling persistsImmediately after the procedureThe worst of the Ultherapy pain sits along the jawline, where bone lies close to the surface.Most patients still tell me afterward that it was more manageable than they'd braced for.The swelling deserves a heads-up.It starts the day after, and because the jawline puffs up, there's a stretch where the face can look more sagged than it did before treatment.Only once that settles at around two weeks does the jawline improvement show itself.ONDA carries almost none of this.Plenty of patients drop in over a lunch break and head back to work.If a wedding, an interview, or a presentation is close at hand, ONDA is the safer bet.Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting Price ComparisonGangnam pricing below.ProcedurePriceUltherapy 100 shotsApprox. KRW 400,000–500,000Ultherapy 300 shotsApprox. KRW 1,200,000–1,500,000ONDA Lifting 100,000J × 1Approx. KRW 700,000ONDA Lifting 100,000J × 3Approx. KRW 1,500,000–2,000,000Compare single sessions and Ultherapy looks like the expensive one.Factor in the treatment interval, though, and the picture shifts.A single ONDA session is unlikely to move the needle as far as Ultherapy does, so three sessions is the realistic standard.That puts you at KRW 1,500,000–2,000,000.Ultherapy, meanwhile, holds with one session every six months at the shortest, once a year at the longest.Convert it to an annual basis and the gap between the two turns out to be smaller than it first appears.Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting: Who Each One SuitsPatients for whom Ultherapy is recommended Those who need precise shot distribution (marked sagging at the front of the face, pronounced left-right asymmetry, and similar cases) Those who want a definite change and are willing to accept pain and swelling Those who would prefer to reduce the number of visits to roughly once a year Patients for whom ONDA Lifting is recommended Those with a thick fat layer Those who have postponed lifting because of pain and downtime Those with an important event within 2–4 weeks Those undergoing lifting for the first time who would like to begin with something less demanding In practice, the choice often isn't limited to one of the two.Some patients arrive with both a thick fat layer and progressed sagging.For them, the sequence I recommend is ONDA first to take the weight off, then Ultherapy to set the structure.Combining procedures with different mechanisms also tends to stretch the result out longer.Even among lifting devices aimed at the same goal, the underlying mechanisms often differ.Repeating one procedure over and over is rarely the best long-term plan.Actual Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting Before and After PhotosCASE 1. Female in her 30s (Ultherapy 300 shots)Left: January 13, 2025Right: December 29, 2025Cheek hollowing and sagging were both present here.Patients with hollowing often assume Ultherapy is bound to make things worse,but working around the hollowed areas isn't a problem.And since Ultherapy allows more precise work than ONDA,it's actually the option I'd recommend for a case like this.The same goes for pronounced left-right asymmetry.Ultherapy lets shots be distributed exactly as intended, which puts it ahead of ONDA and its rubbing motion.CASE 2. Female in her 20s (ONDA Lifting 100,000J, before and after)Left: January 13, 2025Right: June 20, 2025Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting FAQQ. Can Ultherapy and ONDA Lifting be received together?A. They can, and it's a pairing I recommend.The layers and mechanisms involved are different.Having both on the same day is fine too.Q. Cheek hollowing is a concern — which procedure carries more risk?A. It can occur with either one.That said, it's manageable: identify the hollowed areas during the design stage and work around them.Q. Why are three ONDA Lifting sessions recommended?A. There's a limit to how many fat cells any single session destroys.Change tends to read more clearly when three sessions are done at one-month intervals.Three isn't strictly required for an effect to appear, though — first-time patients can have one session and decide from there.Q. Does swelling always occur with Ultherapy?A. It varies between individuals, but it shows up in a considerable proportion of patients.Starting the following day, marked swelling can last a week, with residual swelling up to two weeks.Cold compresses can suppress the regenerative process, so I generally don't recommend them.Q. Are both procedures effective for nasolabial folds?A. The midface, nasolabial folds included, isn't where either procedure is strongest.If nasolabial folds are your main concern, XERF, EMFACE, or Alltite are worth looking at first.Q. For a first lifting procedure, which is the better starting point?A. If the pain and swelling are acceptable to you, I'd start with Ultherapy.It produces a more dramatic result in a lot of cases.And if that alone brings enough improvement, there's no need to add ONDA at all.In ClosingUltherapy and ONDA are both lifting procedures that sharpen the jawline.Today's column ran through the mechanisms, effects, pain, and price — and a number of real differences sit between them.What matters most, though, is talking it through with the physician who'll be performing the treatment and choosing what matches your own condition. Thank you for reading — Dr. Kim Do-hoon, ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : Ultherapy vs. ONDA LiftingAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.08.25Lifting
Onda Body Contouring in Korea: Sessions, Joules, and What It Costs
Diet is dialled in, the gym is happening, and the lower abdomen and flanks still haven't moved.I hear that a lot.Onda body contouring is aimed squarely at that kind of stubborn, localized fat.It's non-invasive, and it uses 2.45 GHz microwaves to selectively heat the subcutaneous fat layer — going after localized fat, cellulite, and skin laxity in one go.Cost in the Gangnam district runs roughly KRW 500,000 to 1,200,000 per area per session, excluding VAT.That range moves with the size of the area treated, the joule count applied, and how many sessions you end up needing.ODE Clinic has been doing lifting, tightening, and body contouring since 2022.As of 2026, our returning patient count is past 6,000.Below: how Onda actually works, who it suits, how joule settings get decided, how many sessions you should plan for, and what it costs by area.What Onda Body Contouring Is(1) Microwaves, not radiofrequencyConcentrating heat in the fat layer without burning the skin surface — that's what Onda is built to do.The frequency is what makes it possible.At 2.45 GHz, the electrical conductivity of the skin surface is low enough that energy passes through the epidermis with barely any absorption.Manufacturer data puts roughly 80% of the delivered energy into the subcutaneous fat layer,with the remaining 20% staying in the epidermis and dermis. (Source: DEKA)The device itself came out of DEKA in Florence, Italy.It delivers those 2.45 GHz microwaves under the Coolwaves name.How it generates heat also separates it from conventional radiofrequency.RF passes a current through tissue and works off the resistive heat that follows.Onda uses dielectric heating instead — the energy agitates molecules within the tissue directly, and the friction produces the heat.(2) Three things happen at onceFat reductionHeated adipocytes sustain membrane damage and release their contents.The lymphatic system clears those contents over the following weeks.Cellulite improvementHeat reaches the fibrous septa anchoring the fat lobules.That's what softens the dimpled surface appearance.Skin tighteningCollagen fibres in the dermis contract immediately, and new collagen forms behind them.The point is keeping skin firm where fat volume has just come out.(3) Handpiece depth decides the targetHandpieceDepth of actionPrimary targetDeepDeep (approx. 7 mm)Localized fat (abdomen, thighs, flanks)ShallowSuperficial (approx. 3 mm)Cellulite, skin laxity, submental areaWith fibrotic cellulite, sequence matters.A 2024 international advisory board paper recommends one to two opening sessions on the Shallow handpiece before moving to Deep.Go straight to Deep where there's considerable subcutaneous fibrosis and that fibrotic tissue acts as a shield, cutting energy transfer. (Source: Bioengineering, 2024)Cellulite that far along isn't something we see often, mind you.Who Onda Body Contouring Suits Those with stubborn lower abdominal or flank fat that persists despite diet and exercise Those with laxity and loss of firmness on the inner upper arms Those concerned about dimpled, orange-peel texture on the posterior thighs Those whose skin has loosened following weight loss, leaving the contour undefined Those experiencing reduced abdominal firmness after pregnancy Those who want to maintain their routine without downtime One thing to be clear about up front.Onda body contouring is not a weight loss procedure.The target is circumference, contour, and surface texture — not the number on the scale.It doesn't act on visceral fat, and patients with a higher body mass index tend to find the results less satisfying.Timing is worth setting expectations on too.Straight after the session, most patients notice nothing beyond a sensation of tightness.Measurable circumference change generally starts showing from two to four weeks onward.Released fat content needs time to clear metabolically, and collagen needs time to remodel.The most visible result usually lands around three months after the final session.How Joule Settings Get DecidedPricing in Korea generally runs by joule count.One joule is the standard unit of energy, and 10,000 joules equals 10 kJ.(1) Surface area comes firstThe international advisory board recommendations describe dividing the treatment zoneinto subareas of roughly 15 × 15 cm and working through them in sequence.Bigger area, proportionally higher joule count. Straightforward enough.(2) Fat thickness and tissue density come secondA thicker fat layer needs more energy to reach the thermal threshold.Thin areas work the other way.Deliver the same joule count to somewhere like the upper arm and you get more discomfort without a matching gain in result.Which is why the treating physician should palpate the area beforehand.Fat thickness, dermal elasticity, how firm any cellulite banding feels — all of it needs checking by hand.(3) Recommended joules by areaAreaRecommended joules (per session)Full abdomen100,000–200,000 JFlanks (love handles)100,000 JUpper arms (both)100,000 JThighs (both)100,000–200,000 JSubmental (double chin)50,000–100,000 JPush past these ranges and the result doesn't scale with the energy.Settings within the ranges above are what we advise.Sessions and Treatment Intervals(1) Three to four sessions for body areasA single session rarely gets you to the target level of improvement.Thermal stimulation has to accumulate before adipocyte reduction and collagen remodelling happen to any meaningful degree.International clinical data and the manufacturer protocol both land on three to four sessions for body areas.Korean clinics commonly advise three or more, spaced three to four weeks apart.(2) Three to four weeks between sessionsThe interval exists because of clearance time.Contents released from damaged adipocytes need at least two to three weeks to drain through the lymphatic system.Deliver energy again before that finishes and you add tissue burden without materially improving the outcome.(3) Duration and booster sessionsAfter a three-session course, results tend to hold for roughly six months to a year.That figure swings considerably with weight management, diet, and activity level.Since the adipocyte count itself has come down, fat accumulates more slowly in the treated area.Not a free pass, though.If the remaining adipocytes enlarge, circumference can climb again.For maintenance, a single booster session at six to twelve months is the general recommendation.Onda Body Contouring Price in KoreaGangnam district pricing below. Korean won, excluding VAT.AreaPer sessionThree-session courseFull abdomenKRW 700,000–1,350,000KRW 1,800,000–3,500,000FlanksKRW 700,000KRW 1,800,000Upper arms (both)KRW 700,000KRW 1,800,000Thighs (both)KRW 700,000–1,350,000KRW 1,800,000–3,500,000Onda Body vs Other Body TreatmentsCategoryOnda bodyLipolytic injectionEMSCULPT NEOMechanismMicrowave (2.45 GHz)PharmacologicalRF + muscle stimulation (HIFEM)Fat reductionYesYesYesMuscle gainNoNoYesSkin tighteningYesNoYesCelluliteCan improveLimitedLimitedDiscomfortLowModerateLowDowntimeMinimalSwelling, bruisingMinimalSessions3–45 or more3–4I see a steady stream of patients who reduced circumference with lipolytic injections and then found the overlying skin had loosened.Take fat out with no tightening response behind it and the contour can end up looking less defined, not more.That's where Onda separates itself.Fat reduction and skin tightening arrive together.In my own view, pairing Onda body with EMSCULPT NEO is the most effective approach. Upper arms: Onda body + EMSCULPT NEO Abdomen: Onda body + EMSCULPT NEO Thighs: Onda body + EMSCULPT NEO Buttocks: EMSCULPT NEO aloneSide Effects and LimitationsOnda body contouring is regarded as relatively safe.That isn't the same as having no side effects.(1) Common reactionsTransient erythema at the treated site is the most common by far.One clinical study saw temporary redness in roughly 72 percent of subjects, resolving within hours in most cases.Some patients report a dull soreness for several days afterwards.Think delayed-onset muscle soreness after a hard session at the gym.(2) Uncommon but noteworthy side effectsWhere energy goes in excessively, or the handpiece dwells too long in one position, you can get surface burns, blistering, or localized fat depression.Which makes a consistent handpiece movement rate a matter of technique, not just settings.(3) Limitations of the evidenceOne point deserves a frank statement.The 2024 international advisory board paper itself notes that evaluation of this method's long-term efficacy and safety is still lacking.A one-year follow-up study published in 2023 was retracted in January 2026 over deficiencies in the peer review process.So the accurate way to understand Onda body contouring is this:short- and medium-term data is accumulating, but multi-year evidence isn't there yet.Frequently Asked QuestionsQ. Is one Onda body session enough to see results?A. For real improvement, three or more.That said, one session isn't nothing.Starting with a single session and deciding on more from there is perfectly reasonable.Q. Does Onda body contouring reduce body weight?A. The scale will barely move.This isn't weight loss — circumference and contour improve as adipocyte volume comes down.Onda also doesn't act on visceral fat.Q. Is more energy always better?A. No.Each area has an appropriate range, and past it the results stop scaling.Q. When can exercise or sauna use resume after treatment?A. Normal activity, same day.Vigorous exercise, hot saunas, and heavy drinking are best left alone for at least three days.Drinking plenty of water helps clear the released fat content, too.Q. Is Onda body the same device as facial Onda lifting?A. Same device, yes.The handpieces and parameters used may differ.Q. Can Onda body contouring improve severe cellulite?A. Improvement is possible.Where fibrosis is advanced, though, the sequence matters — one to two initial sessions on the shallow handpiece, then progress to the deep one.Skip that and energy delivery gets compromised.Closing RemarksWhen you're comparing Onda body contouring prices, the headline figure isn't the one that matters.What matters is how many joules go in, across what area.Same region, same price, and actual energy delivery can still differ by a factor of two.Worth repeating as well: this isn't a weight loss procedure.Satisfaction runs highest among patients who come to it for the residual localized fat and loosened skin left over after diet and exercise have done their part.Rather than deciding on your own, consult a treating physicianwho assesses fat thickness and skin quality directly and designs the joule plan around what they find.Thank you for reading — Dr. Kim Do-hoon, ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : ONDA Body ContouringAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.08.25Lifting
EMFACE Lifting in Seoul: Do the Results and Duration Justify the Price?
Four EMFACE sessions in Gangnam: roughly KRW 2,000,000 to 3,000,000.That's about what a single Ultherapy or Thermage session runs.So the question comes up a lot — is the lifting actually substantial enough to warrant that?I suspect the format feeds the doubt.Nobody stands over you delivering energy by hand. The applicators go on and the treatment runs itself.The effect is there, though, and it's been demonstrated in objective measurements.Today I want to open up a 2025 study in Asian patients and go through it properly.How much lifting actually happens, how long it holds, where EMFACE and Ultherapy part ways, and how it fits alongside other midface work.※ For general information about the treatment, please refer to the column EMFACE lifting results, price and treatment duration.How EMFACE Lifting WorksTwo types of energy, delivered at the same time.(1) HIFES (High Intensity Facial Electrical Stimulation)The slackened muscle itself — that's what EMFACE goes after.Devices like Ultherapy and Thermage contract the skin, the retaining ligaments, and the fascial layer. EMFACE drops a layer below all of that.Facial muscle tone declines with age, and lower tone means the muscle sits slack even at rest.But not every facial muscle does the same job.Some pull tissue upward. Others drag it down.EMFACE strengthens only the elevators.The study spells this out too.The device induces contractions in the frontalis, the zygomaticus major and minor, and the risorius— at an intensity you simply cannot produce voluntarily.Applicator positions are laid out to steer clear of depressor muscles like the glabellar muscles and the masseter, which can make wrinkles worse.Hence the nickname, "midface lifting."As the zygomaticus major and minor grow stronger, the midface reads as visually shorter.(2) RF (Radiofrequency)Electromagnetic stimulation isn't all that comes out of the device. Radiofrequency does too.EMFACE runs its RF at 3.2 MHz.That's lower than the 6.78 MHz used by Thermage or Density.Lower frequency, deeper heat.Which is why the aim here is lifting at the level of the retaining ligaments and fascia rather than dermal tightening.The study reports dermal temperature hitting 40°C within the first two minutes.From there it's maintained up to 42.5°C.That heat denatures collagen fibers and stimulates fibroblasts, which leads to new collagen and elastin formation.Human histologic studies have confirmed a 30% increase in collagen and a 102.8% increase in elastin three months out.Source: Goldberg DJ, Lal K. Treatment With Synchronized Radiofrequency and Facial Muscle Stimulation: Histologic Analysis of Human Skin for Changes in Collagen and Elastin Fibers. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2024;23:1620-1628.EMFACE Results: The Actual FiguresThe study in question came out of Siriraj Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University in Thailand.Source: Manuskiatti W, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Synchronized Radiofrequency and High Intensity Facial Electrical Stimulation in Improving Facial Skin Laxity and Quality in Asians. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2025;57:177-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23878There's a reason I reach for this one specifically.Every participant was Asian, and the results were tracked with 3D measurement equipment for six months after treatment.Fifteen participants, aged 40 to 65, with mild to moderate laxity.Four weekly sessions on the forehead and both cheeks, twenty minutes each, at 100% power.At ODE Clinic, most treatments run at 100% power as well.(1) Cheek liftingFrom 1.240 mm before treatment to 1.373 mm one month after the fourth session.(2) Forehead and eyebrow liftingForehead lifting climbed from 1.447 mm to 2.140 mm.The biggest mover was the eyebrow.Baseline of 21.56 mm rose to 22.95 mm at three months — an average elevation of 1.39 mm.(3) Skin firmness and textureSkin firmness (R0) had already improved 45.68% before the third session.By six months it reached 81.24%.Here's the interesting part: firmness kept climbing even while the lifting measurements were on their way down.Crow's feet improved 12.39% at three months and 10.70% at six.Forehead pore volume dropped 66.26% at six months.Contrary to a fairly common assumption, then,the lifting effect of EMFACE has been verified in objective measurements.And there are plenty of clinical studies beyond this one.The patient self-assessment is worth a look as well.At six months, 40% of participants rated their facial contour as more than 50% improved.Another 27% put it above 75%.Not one participant reported no visible improvement at all.EMFACE Duration: What the Six-Month Data ShowsThe most candid part of this study is the durability question.Earlier papers described results holding for roughly a year after four to six sessions.These findings tell a somewhat different story.Forehead lifting peaked at 2.140 mm one month after the fourth session.At six months: 0.673 mm.About one third of the peak.Cheek lifting followed the same curve, falling from 1.373 mm to 0.580 mm.So the measured lifting effect drops to roughly a third of its high point across six months.The eyebrow held onto 1.31 mm of elevation at the same time point, though.And skin firmness kept rising right through.Why would one part fade while another holds?Because the two energies behave differently.Muscle tone drifts back toward baseline once the stimulation stops.Collagen built by radiofrequency sticks around far longer.The study makes the point outright.Facial muscles are skeletal muscles like any other — they need consistent workload to hold tone, and they atrophy without it.Which puts EMFACE closer to periodic maintenance than a one-and-done procedure.Measured results peak somewhere between one and three months after the fourth session.If there's an important date on your calendar, work backward from that window.How EMFACE Differs From UltherapyThe most frequently asked question, by some margin.Both have "lifting" in the description. The layers they act on have almost nothing in common.Ultherapy uses high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to create thermal coagulation points at 3.0 mm or 4.5 mm.Heat concentrates at a single point above 60°C, and the tissue contracts hard.The primary target is the fascial (SMAS) layer.EMFACE goes deeper still, to the muscle layer.It isn't contracting tissue — it's restoring tone to slackened muscle so the upward pulling force comes back.CategoryUltherapyEMFACEEnergyFocused ultrasound (HIFU)Electromagnetic stimulation + RF (3.2 MHz)Target layerFascia (SMAS), subcutaneous fatMuscle layer, fascial layerMechanismTissue contraction via thermal coagulation pointsRestored muscle tone + collagen regenerationStrongest areaJawline, double chinEyebrows, midface, nasolabial foldsPainPresent (anesthesia recommended)MinimalDowntimeSwelling for 1–2 weeksMinimalNumber of sessions14–6 sessions, 7–10 days apartOnset of resultsClear at 2–3 months1–3 months after the fourth sessionCollapsed jawline and a double chin? Ultherapy is closer to the right answer.Heavy-feeling eye area with midface descent deepening the nasolabial folds? EMFACE.Each has its blind spots, too.Ultherapy does little for the nasolabial region, where there's no fascia to work with, or for the jowls, where nerves run.EMFACE lacks the power to lift heavy tissue below the jawline.So they aren't competitors. They cover for each other.I see plenty of patients arrive for EMFACE after Ultherapy, once the midface still feels unresolved.EMFACE PriceAround KRW 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 for four sessions in Gangnam.Prices vary by clinic and promotion.Comparable to 600 shots of Ultherapy or 600 shots of Thermage.The cost comes mostly from consumables.The device is expensive to begin with, and new forehead and cheek applicators go on for every single session.Those are genuine consumables, and they eat a substantial share of the per-session cost.Which is why an unusually low price deserves a question — starting with whether the equipment is genuine.Who EMFACE Suits, and What to Combine It With(1) Recommended candidates People whose upper eyelids have descended, making the double eyelid line look heavy People who want to address nasolabial folds and midface lifting together People who have had Ultherapy or Thermage and want additional improvement People who want a treatment with minimal pain and downtime People preparing for a wedding or similar event who want natural facial expression And the cases where I'd generally point elsewhere: People who prefer a single-session treatment and cannot visit repeatedly People whose goal is the jawline and V-line rather than the eyebrows or midface People with implanted electrical devices such as pacemakers (2) Midface Descent Requires Looking at Three Things TogetherMidface descent never comes from one cause.Volume loss and tissue descent happen side by side.The anterior cheek and tear trough hollow out as volume goes.The tissue below them slides downward and forms the nasolabial folds.So the approach has to be threefold. Fill what's hollow, draw the descended tissue back against the underlying structure, pull the slackened muscle upward.Each procedure covers a different piece of that. Anterior cheek filler: fills the hollowed anterior cheek and tear trough, restoring structural support to the midface. XERF: contracts the fibrous septae using dual 6.78 MHz and 2 MHz frequencies, tightening the nasolabial folds and jowls. EMFACE: restores tone to the zygomatic muscles so that midface tissue is drawn upward. ODE Clinic has extensive experience with all three.Before and After Midface Sagging and Volume Loss Treatment: Emface, Filler, XerfEMFACE Side Effects and PainPain is barely a factor here.In the study, mean pain scores fell from 3.5 at the first session to 1.6 at the fourth, on a ten-point scale.The treatment got more comfortable as sessions went on, in other words.No serious adverse events were reported.Saying there are no side effects at all wouldn't be accurate, though.The most common issue in practice is poor applicator adhesion.If part of an applicator lifts away mid-treatment, radiofrequency energy concentrates on one side.That's where a mild burn or blister comes from.Most of it is preventable.Remove cosmetics and oil from the skin thoroughly beforehand, and check applicator contact during the session.Beyond that, temporary redness is the main finding.There's virtually no downtime that interferes with daily life.Frequently Asked Questions About EMFACEQ. How is this different from doing facial exercises?A. The intensity of contraction, fundamentally.HIFES induces contractions you cannot produce voluntarily, with collagen regeneration from radiofrequency happening alongside.On top of that, tensing your face recruits muscles you didn't want — the glabella, for instance.That's the ceiling on voluntary facial exercise.Q. When are EMFACE results at their best?A. One to three months after the fourth session.In the study, forehead and cheek both hit their highest values one month after the final treatment.Got an important date coming? Count backward from there.Q. Should Ultherapy or EMFACE come first?A. Pronounced laxity with the jawline as the goal — Ultherapy first.Eyebrows and midface as the main concern, or Ultherapy already done — EMFACE may serve you better.They target different layers, so plenty of patients simply do both.Q. Will EMFACE alone fill hollow cheeks?A. No.The volume measurements in the study showed no significant change in the anterior cheek or tear trough.Where volume loss is the main concern, anterior cheek filler or Hilowave belongs in the plan.Q. Can XERF and EMFACE be done together?A. Frequently combined, yes.XERF draws descended tissue back against the underlying structure while EMFACE pulls the muscle upward.For midface improvement, the two dovetail nicely.Q. How often should treatment be repeated?A. Generally 9 to 12 months after a course of four sessions.Muscle tone drifts back to baseline once stimulation stops.Treating EMFACE as periodic maintenance makes more sense than treating it as a one-off.Q. Can it be combined with fillers or botulinum toxin?A. It often is.Sequence and intervals do need adjusting by area, though.Botulinum toxin relaxes muscle, which can work against the purpose of EMFACE in certain regions.Plan it directly with the physician doing the treatment.ClosingEMFACE is a device with clearly verified results.Whether it feels worth the price comes down to what you're expecting from it.Want a change in the impression of your eye area and midface? Satisfaction tends to run high.Want a dramatic jawline correction out of a single session? Ultherapy or something else fits better.And midface descent is rarely settled by one device on its own.It calls for a combination: filling what's hollow, tightening what has descended, lifting what has slackened.Rather than deciding on your own, sit down with an experienced physician and work it out together. Thank you for reading — Dr. Kim Do-hoon, Medical Director of ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : EmfaceAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.08.25Lifting
How to Choose a Density RF Clinic in Seoul: 2026 TOP 10 Clinic Selection
ODE Clinic was selected as a TOP 10 clinic by Density treatment volume for the first half of 2026.Density is a 6.78MHz monopolar radiofrequency treatment that induces collagen remodelling in the dermis to improve skin firmness.Most people open the price list first when they're picking a clinic.Two other things deserve a look before that one.Whether the treating physician handles the consultation personally,and how much cumulative treatment experience the clinic actually holds.ODE Clinic is an anti-aging clinic in Gangnam, Seoul, built around lifting, tightening and volume procedures.Thermage, Density, XERF — we run all three monopolar radiofrequency systems side by side.Which means nobody gets steered toward one device by default.The treating physician reviews all three during consultation and recommends whichever fits.What follows are the criteria I've built up from my own case volume.What Density actually does, and what to verify before you book anywhere.Written personally by Dr. Kim Do-hoon, Representative Director, ODE Clinic. Updated: August 29, 2026What the TOP 10 Density Recognition Actually MeansTreatment volume on its own guarantees nothing.Worth saying that up front.With radiofrequency devices, though, volume carries more than a plain number does.A high case count means the physician has personally worked through a wide range of skin conditions.Energy level adjustment and shot distribution by facial zone especially.Neither reduces neatly to a manual.Two patients can both receive 600 shots and walk out with different outcomes,depending on which areas got how many shots and at what energy level.Volume isn't the same as satisfaction, mind you.Larger clinics with many physicians accumulate higher totals as a matter of course,but the person consulting and the person treating aren't always the same.So treatment volume only tells you something when you read it alongsidewhether one treating physician accumulated that experience directly.What Density Does, and HowDon't come to Density expecting a lift.This is a tightening treatment.The distinction is worth spelling out.Lifting means procedures like Ultherapy, which deliver energy to the SMAS layer and physically elevate sagging contours.Tightening delivers heat to the dermis instead, contracting loosened collagen and stimulating new collagen synthesis.Density doesn't raise sagging tissue. It makes skin firmer and smoother.The two serve different purposes and don't substitute for each other,which is exactly why so many patients have Ultherapy and radiofrequency treatments together.The patients who end up least satisfied are usually the ones who missed this distinction.Some switch from Ultherapy to a radiofrequency treatment like Density out of concern about facial volume loss.But Density won't lift sagging tissue directly.Skin texture and firmness improve; the sagging stays.If sagging is your main concern, the outcome is likely to disappoint.What Makes the Density Alpha Tip Different(1) Sequential monopolar and bipolar deliveryThermage and the Density classic tip emit monopolar radiofrequency only.The alpha tip adds something on top of that.Monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, delivered in sequence.Bipolar distributes energy evenly across relatively superficial layers.That gives you more complete heat delivery, from the lower dermis right through to the upper.Since the superficial layers get treated alongside the deeper ones, visible change tends to be more distinct than with the classic tip.On skin analyser imaging, the degree of fine-line improvement has measurably improved compared with the classic tip.(2) What the literature shows about sequenceAn animal study has compared different sequences of radiofrequency delivery.Related study: Oh S, et al. Combined Treatment of Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Increases Skin Elasticity by Decreasing the Accumulation of Advanced Glycated End Products in Aged Animal Skin. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6):2993. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35328415/Collagen and elastin synthesis came out highest when monopolar delivery was followed by bipolar.Monopolar lowers tissue impedance first, and bipolar energy transfers more efficiently after that.Related study: Kumar N, Baek SY. Epidermal and Dermal Regeneration Through Sequential Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency: Evidence From an Aging Mouse Model. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf111. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf111This one was conducted on the Density device itself.Collagen density increased more with the combined monopolar and bipolar protocol than with monopolar alone.One caveat, and it's a meaningful one: both are animal studies.Stating that the same magnitude of difference reproduces on human facial skin isn't something the evidence supports yet.(3) Treatment time and discomfortDensity is a high-output device, so discomfort comes with it, much as it does with Thermage.The session moves faster, though.Thermage FLX runs roughly 35 to 40 minutes for 600 shots.The Density alpha tip covers the same count in about 25.Overall discomfort ends up lower as a result.For a closer look at pricing and tip-by-tip differences, see the column onDensity alpha tip results, cost and how it differs from Thermage.What to Check Before Choosing a Density Clinic(1) Whether the treating physician consults directlyA consultation with a coordinator and a consultation with the physician who'll be holding the handpiece are two different things.Skin thickness, fat volume, degree of sagging — all of it has to be assessed in person before anyone can say whether Density is the right call.Plenty of patients arrive having already settled on Density, change course after the consultation, and end up happy with the alternative.Getting the treating physician involved from the selection stage is worth prioritising.(2) Cumulative experience and tip consumptionThe same device produces different results in different hands.Some clinics set the energy level once and run the whole session there.Others adjust continuously according to skin thickness and treatment zone.Tip consumption is a reasonably objective proxy for that experience.Asking about cumulative treatment volume or tip usage during consultation is a fair thing to do.(3) Whether post-treatment change is documented objectivelyRadiofrequency tightening develops gradually.Which makes assessing it by eye alone difficult.Confirm that the clinic records skin analyser images before and after, and actually reviews them with you.(4) Whether other devices are discussed in comparisonA clinic that only operates Density has little choice but to arrive at Density.A clinic running both lifting and tightening devices can do something different.It can clarify whether you need tightening or lifting at this stage, before anything else.If you're weighing device options, the 2026 lifting treatment comparison — Ultherapy, XERF, EMFACE, ONDA and Alltite — may be useful.How ODE Clinic Approaches DensityAt ODE Clinic, the treating physician runs the consultation one-on-one.Whether Density is appropriate, how many shots are needed,whether a lifting treatment should be combined — all of it gets worked out together with the patient.After treatment, come back whenever you like. he treating physician reviews the change directly on skin analyser imaging.Individual results may vary.And Density doesn't get recommended to everyone.Where sagging is the primary concern, a lifting treatment may take priority over radiofrequency tightening.Where volume loss is present too, sequencing the treatments differently is often the better route.Patients new to aesthetic dermatology, unsure how to decide, get supported through that decision as well.Density Frequently Asked QuestionsQ. How many Density shots are needed?A. 600 shots or more.Thermal energy has to accumulate to a certain level before results appear.For patients in their 50s and above, or where sagging is present, 900 shots or more may be advised.Q. Which is better, Density or Thermage?A. Depends on the goal.Want the original device with the longest-established body of evidence? Thermage FLX.Prioritising cost efficiency? The Density alpha tip.Density is also what I'd suggest first for anyone sensitive to discomfort.Q. Is Density painful?A. There's a degree of discomfort.On a scale of one to ten, roughly six to seven.Treatment time is short and the cooling system runs throughout, so it lands lower than Thermage overall.For patients concerned about pain, topical anaesthetic goes on for up to one hour and thirty minutes.Q. When do Density results appear?A. Collagen contraction gives an immediate change you'll feel right after treatment.Change from collagen remodelling appears from two to three months onward, and tends to be most distinct around six months.Come back at around three months and comparative skin analyser images usually show the textural change clearly.Q. How often should Density be repeated?A. Once a year, generally.Patients who prefer a more intensive maintenance schedule sometimes repeat at six-month intervals.Q. Does Density have side effects?A. Temporary redness, swelling and a sensation of heat can occur.Burns or blistering happen rarely.That's precisely why adjusting the energy level throughout the session matters.Q. In Gangnam, is it enough to compare Density clinics on price alone?A. Price is a legitimate criterion.But the same shot count produces different outcomes depending on energy level and distribution.Check whether the treating physician consults directly, and how much cumulative experience the clinic holds, alongside whatever price comparison you're doing.Closing ThoughtsDensity has been performed for enough patients at ODE Clinic to put us among the TOP 10.It suits patients who want to slow the pace of aging naturally,and patients in their 50s and above whose skin firmness has already declined considerably.No device resolves every concern, though.Rather than deciding on your own, talk the options through with an experienced treating physician first.Thank you for reading — Dr. Kim Do-hoon, ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : DensityAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.09.01All Posts
Volume
Radiesse for Nasolabial Folds: Why CaHA May Work Better Than Juvelook or Sculptra
Radiesse: A Complete Guide to CaHA Collagen BiostimulationRadiesse is a collagen biostimulator based on CaHA, or Calcium Hydroxylapatite. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at how Radiesse works, how it differs from other popular options such as Juvelook Volume, Sculptra, and traditional dermal fillers, and why it can be especially useful for treating nasolabial folds.Last Updated: April 19, 2026By: Dr. Do-hoon Kim, Director of ODE ClinicODE RadiesseThe Science Behind RadiesseRadiesse is composed of 30% CaHA microspheres and 70% CMC gel carrier.CaHA: Activates fibroblasts and helps stimulate the production of new collagen and elastin.CMC Gel Carrier: Provides immediate volume and structural support after injection.Through collagen synthesis, Radiesse can help restore volume in hollow areas.It can also improve skin firmness by tightening the dermal layer,making it useful as an anti-aging treatment for elasticity improvement and slowing visible aging.<Image: Before & After Radiesse for Nasolabial Folds and Perioral Lines>Radiesse vs. PLA-Based Stimulators: Juvelook and SculptraSo how is Radiesse different from PLA-based biostimulators such as Juvelook Volume and Sculptra?1. Collagen Stimulation Through a Non-Inflammatory PathwayPLA-based products, including Juvelook and Sculptra, are known to stimulate collagen by creating a controlled inflammatory response in the surrounding tissue.Because of this mechanism, PLA-based treatments may carry a risk of chronic inflammation or nodule formation related to immune system response.Radiesse, on the other hand, stimulates regeneration mainly through a non-inflammatory mechanical pathway. This means the risk of unpredictable inflammatory nodules is relatively lower.Inflammatory cytokine expression: PLLA vs. CaHA(Related research: Biostimulating fillers and induction of inflammatory pathways: A preclinical investigation of macrophage response to calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-L lactic acid)Note: At ODE Clinic, where we have used various collagen biostimulators for years, Radiesse has shown the lowest incidence of nodule formation in our clinical experience.2. Immediate Volume from the CMC Gel CarrierWith PLA-based treatments such as Juvelook Volume and Sculptra, the product is mixed with saline before injection.Right after the procedure, the area may look temporarily full, but once the saline is absorbed within about a week, the volume returns close to baseline. After that, collagen gradually develops over several months.For patients who want faster visible improvement, this waiting period can feel disappointing.Radiesse is different because the CMC gel carrier creates volume immediately after injection.Over the next 3 to 4 months, the CMC gel is gradually absorbed and replaced by newly synthesized collagen.This makes Radiesse a strong option for patients who want both early improvement and longer-term collagen remodeling.It can also be especially effective in high-movement areas such as the nasolabial folds,because the gel carrier helps maintain space long enough for collagen to form properly.3. Customizable Results Through DilutionRadiesse contains CaHA particles suspended in a CMC gel carrier. In its original form, it has a certain viscosity, similar to a filler.When Radiesse is mixed with saline, the viscosity can be adjusted. Depending on the dilution ratio, the treatment goal changes.Lower dilution: More suitable for volumizing hollow areas.Higher dilution, or hyper-diluted Radiesse: More focused on improving fine lines, skin quality, and elasticity.(Related study: Dilutional rheology of Radiesse: Implications for regeneration and vascular safety)This is why customized dilution is very important.Areas that need structural support should be treated with lower dilution, while areas that need texture and elasticity improvement may benefit from higher dilution.In real practice, many patients need both volume restoration and skin tightening.At ODE Clinic, even within a single Radiesse session, we often use different dilution ratios for different layers and purposes.The dilution ratio is an area where the doctor’s experience and judgment matter greatly. This is one reason why choosing a clinic with extensive Radiesse experience is important.Clinical Application: Why I Prefer Radiesse for Nasolabial FoldsIn my clinical practice, the area where I most actively choose Radiesse over Juvelook Volume, Sculptra, or fillers is the nasolabial fold.Juvelook and Sculptra are injected as PLA particles mixed with saline.Immediately after treatment, the area may look filled, but within 2 to 3 days, it often returns close to its original appearance.The remaining PLA particles then stimulate collagen slowly over time.From experience, broad cheek hollows tend to respond well to collagen stimulation.However, the nasolabial fold is a highly mobile area, and collagen does not always form in the exact intended space.<Image: Before & After 2 Sessions of Radiesse for Nasolabial Folds>Radiesse, because it is supported by the CMC gel carrier, tends to remain in the injected shape for around 3 to 4 months after treatment.During that time, collagen synthesis occurs in that same space, allowing the area to gradually fill in more predictably.For patients whose main concern is cheek hollowing, and who also want some improvement in the nasolabial folds, I may still recommend Juvelook Volume or Sculptra.However, if the nasolabial folds are the primary concern, I usually prefer Radiesse.“If Radiesse Has So Many Advantages, Shouldn’t We Use It for Cheek Hollows Too?”Radiesse is a German skin booster launched by Merz, the same company behind Ultherapy.Compared with many Korean-made products, it tends to be more expensive.If we use Radiesse to fill both cheeks, we may need 2 to 3 syringes per side. In that case, the cost-effectiveness may be lower compared with Juvelook Volume or Sculptra.Also, cheek hollows usually respond well to Juvelook Volume or Sculptra. If a patient wants faster volume, Hilowave or traditional fillers can also be used safely and effectively in many cheek hollowing cases.For that reason, I do not usually use Radiesse as the first choice for broad cheek hollowing.Of course, there is no single fixed answer.The treatment plan can always be adjusted flexibly after consultation.Radiesse Duration and Treatment CycleWith Radiesse and many other collagen stimulators, once volume has developed through collagen formation, the result often lasts at least 2 years.However, the actual duration varies depending on how quickly each person breaks down collagen.Rather than following a fixed schedule, it is best to reassess when you feel the effect has started to fade.My usual recommendation is:Initial course: 2 to 3 Radiesse sessions at 4-month intervals.Maintenance touch-up: 1 Radiesse session every 1.5 to 2 years.This should be decided after direct consultation with the treating doctor.Radiesse CostThe cost of Radiesse varies widely by clinic, but on average,it is usually around 700,000 to 1,000,000 KRW per syringe.At first, the cost may feel high. However, because maintenance is often needed only once every 1.5 to 2 years,the long-term cost is not necessarily excessive compared with many other treatments.More important than price is the clinic’s system.Before choosing a clinic, I recommend checking the following:Does the clinic have extensive experience with Radiesse?Does the treating doctor personally consult and decide the treatment plan?Are there multiple treatment options, and does the clinic recommend what best fits your face?Can the clinic compare before-and-after results using skin diagnostic imaging?Does the clinic use authentic products in proper amounts?Does the doctor customize the dilution ratio according to the treatment purpose?These factors are often more important than choosing the lowest price.Radiesse Side Effects1. NodulesBecause Radiesse stimulates collagen production, nodule formation can occur.However, as mentioned earlier, unlike PLA-based treatments,Radiesse stimulates fibroblasts through a non-inflammatory mechanical pathway.Because of this, the risk of immunological nodule formation is relatively low.Overall, the incidence of nodules is considered low compared with many other collagen stimulators.Note: In my experience, some patients may feel a small lump near the injection entry point 1 to 2 months after Radiesse treatment.Unlike nodules caused by PLA-based treatments, these small lumps often resolve naturally within a few months.Therefore, if a small bump is felt early after Radiesse treatment and it is not growing, I usually recommend observation first.2. Vascular Occlusion and BlindnessIt is well known that filler injections around the nasolabial folds can, in rare cases, block blood vessels and cause tissue necrosis or even blindness.However, according to research on Radiesse dilution, even slight dilution can significantly lower the elastic modulus, or G’, of Radiesse.This means that even if diluted Radiesse enters a vessel, it is much less likely to block blood flow.<Image: Elastic modulus according to Radiesse dilution ratio>3. MigrationThe nasolabial fold area moves constantly because of facial muscle activity.For this reason, fillers injected into the subcutaneous layer may sometimes migrate upward.Radiesse behaves differently. Soon after injection, collagen fibers begin forming between the particles and surrounding tissue, creating an anchoring effect in the original injection space.Because of this, Radiesse is much less likely to migrate, even in high-movement areas.Overall, Radiesse can be considered a treatment with relatively low side-effect risk compared with some alternatives.However, once injected, it cannot be dissolved or reversed.Therefore, accurate layer placement and delicate injection technique are extremely important.Radiesse FAQQ. How many Radiesse sessions do I need?A. It depends on the degree and pattern of hollowing, but in most cases, I recommend 2 to 3 sessions spaced 4 months apart. The exact plan should be decided through consultation with an experienced physician.Q. What dilution ratio is best for Radiesse?A. Radiesse can be diluted anywhere from 1:0.25 to 1:3, depending on the goal. Opinions may vary among doctors. Instead of choosing a clinic that uses one fixed dilution ratio for everyone, I recommend choosing a clinic that customizes the ratio based on your facial condition and treatment purpose.Q. Can I return to daily life after Radiesse?A. For about one week after treatment, you may feel slight tightness or foreign body sensation, and bruising may occur. However, it usually does not interfere with daily activities.Q. Can Radiesse be combined with lifting treatments?A. Yes. In many cases, combining Radiesse with lifting treatments can create a much more natural and comprehensive result.Closing ThoughtsRadiesse is not simply a volumizing injection.It is a CaHA-based collagen biostimulator that can provide both immediate support and long-term collagen remodeling.In particular, it can be a strong option for nasolabial folds,where movement is frequent and traditional fillers may raise concerns about migration or foreign body sensation.However, because Radiesse cannot be dissolved, the doctor’s understanding of dilution, injection layer, and facial anatomy is essential.Rather than choosing based on product name alone,I recommend consulting an experienced physician who can design the treatment according to your facial structure and goals.This has been Dr. Do-hoon Kim from ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : RadiesseAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.15Lifting
Density RF Treatment: Benefits, Reviews, Cost, and How It Compares to Thermage
Monopolar radiofrequency treatments, with Thermage being the most well-known example,are often described as a “savings account for your skin.”The reason is simple.These treatments are not only designed to improve skin firmness,but also to help slow the visible aging process over time by supporting collagen remodeling.In Korea, there are many RF devices that work in a similar category to Thermage.Among them, Density is considered one of the more refined and well-built devices, with strong clinical satisfaction.Today, I’ll explain the key features of Density, what kind of results it can provide, and how it differs from Thermage.ODE Density AlphaWhat is Density? Features and EffectsDensity is an anti-aging treatment that uses radiofrequency energy.Rather than being a pure “lifting” treatment, it is more accurately described as a skin-tightening treatment.A lifting treatment, such as Ultherapy, is designed to target deeper layers and improve sagging facial contours more directly.A tightening treatment, such as Density or Thermage, focuses more on improving the quality and firmness of the skin itself.It works by applying heat to loose collagen fibers within the skin, helping them remodel into stronger, tighter collagen structures.This is also why many patients choose to combine Ultherapy with Thermage or Density.Each treatment targets a different layer and purpose.Many patients focus only on improving areas that have already sagged.However, in clinical practice,many patients who maintain a youthful appearance over the years are those who have consistently received RF treatments once a year.You do not need to receive RF treatments too frequently.But over time, the difference between someone who has received annual maintenance and someone who has never done RF treatment can become quite noticeable.Density vs. Thermage: What’s the Difference?In terms of basic concept, Density and Thermage are very similar devices.Their mechanisms, cooling systems, and tip sizes are all comparable.However, there are several differences worth understanding.1. Density Alpha Tip: Monopolar + Bipolar RFThermage and the Density Classic tip use only monopolar RF.The newer Density Alpha Tip, however, delivers both monopolar and bipolar RF at the same time.Bipolar RF is known for delivering energy more evenly to the shallower layers of the skin.In this sense, compared with Thermage,the Density Alpha Tip may provide more complete thermal coverage across both deeper and more superficial layers.This can be especially helpful for patients who want improvement not only in firmness, but also in skin texture and overall glow.2. Cost-EffectivenessThermage has very expensive consumables, which is one of the reasons the treatment cost remains high.Density Classic is usually priced at around 60% of the cost of Thermage,while Density Alpha Tip is often around 80% of the Thermage price.For patients who want a premium RF tightening effect but find Thermage too expensive, Density can be a strong alternative.3. Treatment TimeDensity is also a high-output RF device, so some discomfort can still be expected, similar to Thermage.However, Density generally allows for a shorter treatment time.Thermage FLX 600 shots usually takes around 35 to 40 minutes.Density Alpha 600 shots usually takes around 25 minutes.Because the procedure is completed faster, many patients find the overall experience more tolerable.SummaryIf you want the original device with long-established clinical data, Thermage FLX may be the better choice.If you want a more efficient, cost-effective option with visible tightening effects, Density Alpha Tip can be a very good alternative.Density Treatment CostFor RF treatments, I usually recommend at least 600 shots rather than 300 shots.This is because RF energy needs to accumulate to a certain level in order to trigger meaningful collagen remodeling over time.Density Classic 600 shots usually costs around 1.5 million KRW.Density Alpha Tip 600 shots usually costs around 1.9 million KRW.NoteWhen choosing a clinic, the system and experience of the clinic are more important than simply finding the lowest price.It is important to check whether the doctor personally provides consultation and design before the treatment, and whether the clinic has extensive experience performing Density treatments.How to Maximize Your Density Results1. Hydrate Well Before TreatmentRF energy is delivered more evenly when the skin and tissue are well hydrated.Using sheet masks or focusing on moisturizing care before your appointment can help create better conditions for the treatment.Drinking plenty of water before the procedure may also help. On the other hand, alcohol should be avoided because it can contribute to dehydration.2. Real-Time Energy Level AdjustmentFor RF treatments, better results are usually achieved when the energy level is kept as high as possible within the patient’s tolerable range.Some clinics keep the energy level low throughout the procedure to reduce discomfort.However, if the energy is too low, the final result may be limited.A better approach is for the doctor to communicate with the patient during treatment and adjust the energy level in real time, keeping it both effective and safe.3. Combine with Collagen-Boosting Skin BoostersDensity can create stronger synergy when combined with skin boosters that promote collagen production.Recently, hADM-based skin boosters such as Re2O and CellREDM have been receiving a lot of attention.When combined with Density, they can help enhance the firming and skin-quality improvement effects.This combination can be considered one of the most effective pairing strategies for patients who want a stronger anti-aging result.Closing ThoughtsDensity Alpha Tip can be a great option for patients who find Thermage too expensive but still want a proper RF tightening treatment.However, the device itself is only one part of the result. The doctor’s design, energy adjustment, and clinical experience all play a major role in the final outcome.Rather than deciding alone, I recommend visiting a clinic with extensive Density experience and receiving a personalized consultation.This has been Dr. Do-hoon Kim from ODE Clinic. :)Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : Density AlphaAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.15Volume
Hilowave Treatment Reviews: Before & After, Side Effects, and How It Compares to Juvelook
Hilowave is a volumizing treatment with a slightly different character from conventional hyaluronic acid fillers or collagen-stimulating treatments such as Juvelook Volume.In this article, I’ll explain what makes Hilowave unique, what kind of patients may benefit from it, and how it is actually used in clinical practice.ODE HiloWaveWhat is Hilowave?Hilowave is a soft-textured volumizing treatment based on hyaluronic acid, with only a minimal amount of cross-linking agent, known as BDDE.This low-crosslinking structure gives Hilowave several distinct characteristics compared with traditional HA fillers.1. A Safer Option for Volume RestorationTraditional hyaluronic acid fillers can cause serious complications if they are accidentally injected into a blood vessel. In rare cases, this may block blood flow and lead to tissue damage.Hilowave has a much softer and more fluid consistency. Because of this, even in the unlikely event that it enters a vessel, it is far less likely to cause vascular blockage compared with firmer HA fillers.Another advantage is that Hilowave is not a strong collagen stimulator like Juvelook Volume. Therefore, the risk of nodule formation is extremely low.For patients who are looking for a safer and more conservative volumizing treatment, Hilowave can be a very suitable option.2. Natural-Looking Results with Minimal Foreign Body SensationOne of the common concerns with traditional fillers is the feeling of something “sitting under the skin.”This can be especially noticeable in areas with strong adhesions, such as certain types of sunken cheeks. In these areas, the treatment often requires both gentle release of the adhesion and superficial volume placement.Hilowave works well in this situation because of its soft, spreadable texture. It can fill the hollow area while minimizing the heavy or stiff sensation that some patients experience with standard fillers.3. Immediate Improvement, But Shorter LongevitySince Hilowave is based on hyaluronic acid, the improvement can be seen immediately after treatment.However, the same feature that makes it soft and natural also means that it does not last as long as traditional fillers. Because the amount of cross-linking agent is minimal, the product is absorbed more quickly.In general, Hilowave lasts around 3 to 6 months, depending on the treated area and the patient’s individual metabolism.Hilowave vs. Juvelook Volume vs. Traditional FillersJuvelook Volume, traditional fillers, and Hilowave all improve volume, but they work in different ways.Juvelook Volume is made of PDLLA and works by stimulating collagen production. Because the result depends on the body’s collagen response, it usually takes several months to become visible. Once volume is created, however, the result can last for more than two years. The downside is that the amount of volume gained can be difficult to predict, and nodules may occur in rare cases.Traditional fillers are made of hyaluronic acid. They provide immediate volume and can be used in many facial areas. However, depending on the product and injection site, they may cause a foreign body sensation, and in rare cases, vascular occlusion can occur.Hilowave is also based on hyaluronic acid, but it uses a dual HA structure with a softer texture. It gives immediate improvement like a filler, but feels lighter and more natural. Its main limitation is that it lasts shorter, usually around 3 to 6 months. In exchange, the risk of side effects is very low.In short, Juvelook Volume is better for patients who want gradual, long-lasting collagen-based volume. Traditional fillers are useful when stronger shaping and longer maintenance are needed. Hilowave is ideal for patients who want a soft, natural, and safer option for volume restoration.“Does Hilowave Stimulate Collagen?”Yes, it can.Studies have shown that a combination of low-molecular-weight and high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid may help stimulate collagen and elastin production, while also improving hydration, fine wrinkles, and skin elasticity.Reference: Regenerative Skin Remodeling by a Dual Hyaluronic Acid Hybrid Complex in Multimodal Preclinical ModelsHowever, it is still unclear whether this collagen-stimulating effect is limited mainly to the dermal layer, or whether it can create long-term structural volume similar to treatments such as Juvelook Volume.For that reason, I explain Hilowave as a treatment that can provide immediate volume with some supportive skin-quality benefits, rather than as a full replacement for collagen stimulators.Recommended Areas for HilowaveBecause Hilowave is soft and natural, it does not have the strong shaping power of traditional fillers.For this reason, I do not usually recommend it for areas that require sharp contouring or firm structural support, such as the forehead, nose, lips, or chin.However, I highly recommend it for sunken cheeks.It works well for broad cheek hollowness, and it can also be very useful for narrow, deep cheek hollows caused by adhesions. In these cases, I often recommend Hilowave before Juvelook Volume or standard fillers.Is Hilowave Good for Nasolabial Folds?It can be used for nasolabial folds, but it is not always my first choice.The nasolabial fold area moves constantly when we talk, smile, and eat. Because Hilowave is soft and absorbs relatively quickly, it may break down faster in this area.For patients whose main concern is nasolabial folds, I usually recommend collagen-stimulating treatments such as Radiesse. However, if a patient is very concerned about nodules or wants a safer, lighter option, Hilowave can be considered as an alternative.Hilowave Pricing and DosageHilowave is usually performed in 2cc units.In general, the price ranges from 400,000 to 600,000 KRW per 2cc.The amount needed depends on the depth and width of the hollow area. Patients with mild hollowness may see enough improvement with 2cc. Those with more significant volume loss may need 6 to 8cc.As a general reference, typical sunken cheeks often require around 3cc per side.Frequently Asked QuestionsQ. Can I see results after just one session?A. Yes. Hilowave provides immediate volume, similar to a filler. Unlike collagen stimulators, you do not need to wait several months to notice the first change.Q. How often should I repeat the treatment?A. You can receive a touch-up whenever the volume starts to fade. Most patients return after about 4 to 6 months for reassessment and maintenance.Q. Is there downtime after Hilowave?A. Swelling is usually minimal. Bruising may occur at the cannula entry point, but if it happens, it generally fades within 1 to 2 weeks.ConclusionHilowave is a good option for patients who want natural-looking volume with minimal foreign body sensation and a very low risk of serious side effects.It may not be the longest-lasting treatment, and it is not ideal for areas that require strong shaping. However, for sunken cheeks, especially when adhesions are involved, it can be an excellent choice.The best treatment is not always the strongest or the longest-lasting one. It should be selected based on the area, the depth of hollowing, the patient’s concerns, and the desired level of safety.Rather than deciding on your own, I recommend consulting an experienced doctor who is familiar with Juvelook Volume, traditional fillers, and Hilowave.This has been Dr. Do-hoon Kim from ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : HiloWaveAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.13By Area
The “Peanut-Shaped” Face: What Causes Sunken Cheeks—and How We Treat It (Expert Guide)
Hello, I’m Dr. Do-hoon Kim, Director of Ode Clinic.Today, I’ll be discussing the “peanut-shaped face,”a contour pattern most commonly associated with sunken cheeks and hollow temples,often combined with a heavier, sagging jawline.What is a “Peanut-Shaped Face”?“Peanut-shaped face” is not an official medical diagnosis.In aesthetic medicine, however, it’s a widely used expression that describes a typical aging-related contour change.It refers to a face that looks less like a smooth oval and more like an uneven outline from the front—almost like the silhouette of a peanut shell.This look is usually driven by the following four changes:(1) Sunken Temples(2) Zygomatic (Cheekbone) Protrusion(3) Hollow Cheeks(4) Sagging JawlineAs these combine, the facial line can appear irregular,which often makes the face look older and, in some cases, larger than it truly is.Let’s go through the causes and practical solutions for each area.Causes of a Peanut-Shaped Face by Area(1) Sunken TemplesThe temple is anatomically complex—it contains 13 layers, including skin, fat, fascia, muscle, and bone.In most cases, temple hollowing is driven by atrophy of fat, muscle, and bone.Temple Fat: Subcutaneous fat, superficial temporal fat pad, deep temporal fat pad.Temple Muscle: Temporalis muscle.Temple Bone: Temporal bone.The most common driver is aging, which naturally leads to fat loss, reduced muscle volume, and bone resorption.That said, temple hollowing can become more noticeable with factors such as extreme dieting or repeated Botox injections into the temporalis muscle.(2) Zygomatic (Cheekbone) ProtrusionIn many patients, prominent cheekbones are primarily a matter of congenital bone structure.A comment I hear frequently is:“Doctor, I feel like my cheekbones are getting bigger as I age.”In reality, cheekbones don’t “grow” with age—they tend to become smaller due to bone resorption.What changes is the contrast: as the surrounding areas (temples and cheeks) hollow out,the cheekbones look more pronounced relative to the volume loss around them.(3) Hollow CheeksCheek hollowing most commonly appears in the lateral cheek area, just beneath the zygoma.The main reason is gravitational descent of fat tissue over time.In particular, buccal fat, which contributes to youthful cheek fullness, can shift downward,leaving the original space above it appearing empty.(This is why people stressed about “chubby cheeks” in their 20s often become stressed about “sunken cheeks” in their 30s and 40s.)Other contributors that can accelerate hollowing include:Weakening Support Structures: Facial contouring surgery, orthodontics, or excessive jaw Botox.Fat Atrophy: Buccal fat removal, side effects from lifting procedures (like Ultherapy), or fat-dissolving injections.If you notice hollowing developing, the first step is minimizing preventable triggers.And if you’re doing Ultherapy, a careful, individualized design is essential to avoid unintended fat loss in hollow-prone zones.(4) Sagging JawlineAs fat tissue migrates downward, the lower face can look heavier.This doesn’t just affect the jawline—it can also make cheek hollowing look deeper by comparison.Like other elements of a peanut-shaped contour, this can be influenced by natural aging, facial surgery, orthodontics, and excessive Botox patterns.Treatments for a Peanut-Shaped FaceTo correct a peanut-shaped contour, the strategy is simple in concept but nuanced in execution:Restore volume in the “valleys” (hollows)Reduce or lift the “peaks” (protrusions and sagging)(1) Sunken Temples- FillersThe temple is one of the most reliable filler areas in terms of stability.There is relatively little motion, so filler tends to stay in place and last longer.Also, because much of the volume is placed deeply, results often feel natural with low foreign-body awareness. However, it is technique-sensitive—so it should be performed by an experienced injector.In most cases, I recommend 2–4cc, depending on depth.- Collagen Stimulators (Juvelook Volume, Sculptra, Olidia)These stimulate gradual tissue-based volume through collagen production.The practical limitation is dosage per session:to minimize nodule risk, the injectable amount is often capped,which means the result can be more subtle and less dramatic than filler-based correction.(2) Zygomatic ProtrusionIn most cases, the bone is the dominant factor.However, if palpation suggests meaningful soft tissue volume over the bone, there may be some room for reduction through tissue remodeling.- HIFU (Ulthera, Coolsonic, Shurink)High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound creates thermal coagulation points in fat and SMAS layers to induce contraction.For the lateral cheekbone area, precision matters—so the approach should be focused and conservative.If using Ultherapy, about 100 shots is commonly appropriate for this zone.- XERFA monopolar RF device that incorporates a 2MHz frequency to deliver deeper thermal energy and contract collagen bundles.In many cases, it performs best as a complementary modality—especially when paired with HIFU.- Fat-Dissolving InjectionsAn option if there is significant localized subcutaneous fat contributing to the prominence.(3) Hollow CheeksThis is often the area where patients notice the most visible improvement.For many peanut-shaped faces, treating cheek hollows is a high-impact step.- FillersHyaluronic acid fillers can create the most immediate and dramatic volume restoration.For cheek hollows, products such as Juvederm Voluma and Restylane Volim are commonly used.The major advantages are:The doctor can build volume exactly as intendedOutcomes are relatively predictableThe product can be dissolved if necessaryThe limitation is that cheek hollows are often wide.If the depression is severe, larger volumes may be required,which can increase the chance of foreign-body sensation—or in some cases, spreading or migration.For extensive hollows, a practical strategy is to establish a baseline with a collagen stimulator first,then refine remaining deficits with fillers later.- Juvelook Volume / SculptraThese work by promoting your body’s own collagen productionand encouraging adipocyte differentiation/proliferation—meaning the area is filled with your own tissue over time.This is why they can be ideal for broader, deeper cheek hollowing with minimal foreign-body sensation. They also tend to be stable over time and can improve elasticity.However:Results take longer to appearMultiple sessions are usually neededThe final amount of volume gain is harder to predictAlso, “naturalness” is not determined by the product type alone—it’s largely determined by how much volume is added.These options often appear more natural simply because they typically build volume more gradually and often less dramatically than fillers.- HilowaveHilowave is a newer HA-based product combining low and high molecular weight components.Some clinicians refer to it as a “biostimulator,” but I consider it a filler-category product.What makes it different from classic HA fillers (Juvederm/Restylane)is minimal cross-linking and the dual molecular-weight blend.Practically, it behaves with lower elasticity and a more fluid consistency.That fluidity makes it feel very light—even when used over broader areas—while reducing foreign-body sensation.The tradeoff is lower structural support, which is why it’s not ideal for high-support zones like the nose or chin.For wide cheek hollows, it can be a very useful option.Hilowave can also provide a secondary benefit: as low-molecular-weight HA integrates and is absorbed,it may support collagen synthesis and elasticity improvement.Many patients experience it as a middle option between classic fillers and collagen stimulators.For patients who want faster improvement, I often recommend it.While its longevity is shorter—around 6 months—it typically doesn’t “collapse completely,”and some underlying tissue benefit can remain.For that reason, two sessions spaced about 6 months apart is often a reasonable plan.(4) Sagging Jawline- HIFU Lifting (Ultherapy, CoolSonic, Shurink)Focused ultrasound remains a foundation for lower-face lifting.The closer treatment is to the jawbone,the more discomfort can occur because the thermal points sit nearer to periosteal structures.Despite that, results can be visually strong.If using Ultherapy, I commonly recommend 300–400 shots for the jawline.- XERFA wide-area RF treatment that contracts fibrous septa.It tends to work well for jawline heaviness and often pairs well with treatments that induce fat cell apoptosis.- Onda LiftingUses microwave technology to support fat breakdown.Compared to HIFU, it typically has minimal pain and downtime.Many patients choose it as a quick “lunchtime” procedure.Fat reduction develops gradually over about a month.- Fat-Dissolving InjectionsA helpful add-on for patients with substantial localized fat, to amplify contour change.Peanut-Shaped Face: FAQQ: Can I just get a thread lift instead of filling hollows and lifting sagging areas separately?A: It can feel tempting to view thread lifting as a total solution, but sagging fat cannot be physically returned to its original position. Threads primarily anchor into fascia, not fat cells. A thread lift may provide a temporary “quick fix,” but it is rarely a stand-alone solution for a peanut-shaped contour.Q: Won’t filling my cheeks make my face look bigger?A: Technically, volume is being added—so yes, area can expand. Yet many patients report the face looks smaller afterward because smoothing an uneven contour creates a more compact visual silhouette. If width is a concern, we typically aim for conservative, natural filling combined with lower-face lifting.Q: Does the order of treatments matter?A: Not necessarily. If you feel hesitant about fillers, starting by reducing the cheekbone and jawline “peaks” can make the hollows look less obvious. Once the peaks are softened, the valleys often appear less prominent, and we can plan volume restoration more comfortably.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : "Peanut-Shaped" FaceAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.09Lifting
XERF Lifting Guide : Xerf vs.Thermage, Price, Results
XERF lifting has become one of the most talked-about topics in medical aesthetics lately.Developed and launched by Cynosure Lutronic, it is a monopolar radiofrequency (RF) device positioned in the same broad category as Thermage—but with several meaningful upgrades that distinguish it from conventional RF tightening devices.In this guide, I’ll walk you through—without overcomplicating it—what makes XERF different, what kind of outcomes you can realistically expect, and how pricing is typically structured.XERF Effects: Lifting + Tightening1. What Traditional RF Treatments Are Good AtThe market is already packed with high-performing RF devices—Thermage FLX, Density, Oligio, Volnewmer, and more.Classic monopolar RF treatments generally deliver heat across a broad, relatively superficial zone. As energy accumulates, it triggers collagen denaturation followed by remodeling, which is what creates a firmer and more resilient skin feel over time.Compared to Ultherapy—which can sometimes contribute to facial hollowing in certain anatomy due to deeper effects—RF treatments are largely dermis-centered.That’s why they are widely chosen by patients who want subtle, “natural” anti-aging, with less swelling and minimal downtime.But “natural” also has a downside: the visible “lift” can feel understated.Because traditional RF energy stays mostly within the dermis, the dominant result is tightening—meaning improved firmness and slowing the rate of sagging—rather than strongly repositioning tissue that has already dropped.This is also why some patients, after paying for high-end Thermage, sometimes say:“I’m not sure if it worked.”2. What Makes XERF Different: Dual-Frequency EngineeringXERF was designed with a different philosophy.While many RF devices focused on improving comfort via cooling or reducing consumable costs, XERF aimed to evolve the functionality itself by adding a new frequency layer.By pairing the standard 6.78MHz with an additional 2MHz frequency, XERF can deliver heat beyond the dermis and reach deeper structures such as the subcutaneous fat layer and even the SMAS (fascia) layer.Scientific Reference: Efficacy of dual‐frequency noninvasive monopolar radiofrequency in skin tightening: Histological evidenceThis is the reason XERF is often described as doing more than classic RF tightening.In many cases, it can produce not only a tightening outcome but also a more visible lifting-type improvement—especially in areas where sagging is a key complaint.This is why some reviews call it a “hybrid” feel between Ultherapy and Thermage.Comparison: Thermage FLX vs. XERFFeatureThermage (FLX)XERFMain Frequency6.78MHz (Single)6.78MHz + 2MHz (Dual)Key EffectDermal Tightening & ElasticityTightening + Deep LiftingPain Level★★★★☆ (Sharp pain)★★★☆☆ (Deep heat sensation)Treatment DepthLimited to DermisDermis to SMAS LayerClinical Applications: Why Choose XERF?A fair question is:“Why not just do Thermage for tightening and Ultherapy for lifting?”That can absolutely be a valid strategy. However, in real clinical practice, XERF occupies a very practical middle position—and sometimes solves gaps that the classic “Thermage + Ultherapy” mindset doesn’t fully address.1. Addressing Ultherapy’s Practical LimitationsUltherapy uses focused ultrasound (HIFU) to create discrete thermal coagulation points that contract tissue aggressively.The tradeoff is that it cannot be directly performed in zones where major nerves run close to the treatment layer.On Ultherapy screens, the red-marked areas—often including parts of the jowl region—are typically areas where direct shots are avoided.Unfortunately, those are also areas that commonly sag and can become more etched if left untreated.Because XERF works through bulk heating rather than pinpoint coagulation, it can often be applied more safely around the jowl area to create a lifting-support effect without the same nerve-risk profile.2. Synergy for Stronger Lifting OutcomesXERF tends to influence the retaining ligament support system. Ultherapy, on the other hand, is often discussed around fascia contraction and focal tissue tightening. Since they are not identical in mechanism, combining them can produce synergy for patients who want more comprehensive lifting.3. Comfort and Scheduling Advantages (Pain + Downtime)Ultherapy commonly produces a sharp and deep type of discomfort, often described as 7–8/10 by patients. XERF is usually felt more as a deep heat sensation, and its ICD cooling system helps keep it more tolerable—often around 5/10 for many patients.Also, while Ultherapy can cause swelling for 1–2 weeks, XERF typically has minimal downtime, which is one reason it’s frequently chosen by patients with busy schedules or upcoming events.XERF Treatment CostXERF is most commonly performed as 300-shot or 600-shot sessions.300 Shots: Often selected when the goal is primarily lifting in specific sagging zones. (Approx. 1 million KRW)600 Shots: More suitable when the plan includes both tightening and lifting as a full-face concept. (Approx. 1.8–2 million KRW)How to Choose the Right Clinic for XERFInstead of picking a clinic purely based on the lowest price, I recommend checking these practical factors:1. Clinical ExperienceUnlike many standard RF devices, XERF requires real-time depth adjustment depending on the area and purpose. That means outcomes can vary significantly depending on the doctor’s technique and accumulated experience.Note: ODE Clinic was selected as a 2025 XERF TOP 10 Clinic.2. Direct Consultation with the DoctorMake sure the performing physician evaluates your face directly and confirms whether XERF is truly the best match—or whether a different combination would suit your anatomy and goals better.ConclusionXERF is not simply a “cheaper Thermage.” It is a dual-frequency RF platform designed to deliver deeper structural lifting support, a territory that classic RF tightening alone has historically struggled to reach.XERF can be an excellent choice if you:Want tightening and lifting togetherAre bothered by nasolabial folds or jowls that Ultherapy couldn’t fully addressNeed a treatment with minimal downtime before an important eventRather than trying to decide alone, I recommend building a plan through a personalized consultation at a clinic with proven experience.This is Dr. Do-hoon Kim from ODE Clinic. :)Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : XERFAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.07By Area
Nasolabial Folds: Choosing the Right Treatment (Radiesse, XERF, EMFACE, CoolSoniq) Based on Root Causes
After meeting countless patients near Gangnam Station, one request I hear almost daily is:“Doctor, can you get rid of these smile lines?” But nasolabial folds are not “just wrinkles.” They’re the visible outcome of multiple anatomical shifts happening at once.That’s why only filling the depression can leave the face looking oddly bulky, and only pulling upward often fails to deliver the improvement patients expect. Today, drawing on my clinical experience—including more than 5,000 vials of Juvelook Volume—I’ll explain the core drivers behind nasolabial folds and the evidence-based way to approach them. Updated: June 5, 2026 By: Dr. Do-hoon Kim, Representative Director of ODE Clinic The 4 Anatomical Factors That Form Nasolabial Folds As we age, the face doesn’t change in just one layer. Bone, muscle, fat compartments, and the skin itself all evolve together—and that combined shift is what deepens the nasolabial fold. ① Downward Displacement and Sagging of Fat Tissue When the retaining ligaments that support the malar fat pad (upper cheek fat) weaken, the fat gradually yields to gravity. That descended cheek fat then drapes toward the nasolabial region, creating a deeper groove and shadow—often described as a “valley.” Source: Anatomic Study of the Retaining Ligaments of the Face and Applications for Facial Rejuvenation ② Bone Resorption (The Maxilla) This is the factor most people overlook. With aging, the maxilla (upper jawbone area beside the nose) can lose volume. If the structural base recedes, the soft tissue above it collapses inward—similar to how a building shifts when its foundation sinks. Source: Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies ③ Loss of Skin Elasticity and Collagen Collagen and elastin within the dermis decline steadily (often discussed as roughly 1% per year), making skin thinner and less springy. Once elasticity drops, repeated folding gradually imprints a persistent surface crease—the area where makeup commonly cakes or cracks. ④ Overactive Expression Muscles When muscles used in smiling—such as the levator labii superioris—pull the skin too aggressively over time, the fold can become “trained” into place and progressively fixed. In most patients, these four causes appear together, just in different proportions. If you ignore that and try to treat all nasolabial folds with a single method, you either get minimal change—or an unnatural look. For example, when someone tries to “erase” the entire fold purely by filling, the result often shifts toward a face shape like this. ❗Of course, some patients are dominated by sagging while others are dominated by hollowing. That’s why adjusting the plan to your anatomy is essential—and why a true 1:1 physician consultation should happen before treatment design. Customized Treatment Solutions by Type (Evidence-Based) Type 1. When Sagging Fat Is the Main Cause: Lifting When sagging is the primary driver, the priority is to reduce the descended fat bulk and reinforce the support system. CoolSoniq & Ultherapy (HIFU): High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound can encourage fat reduction and tissue contraction. In the nasolabial zone, CoolSoniq may outperform classic Ultherapy in certain patients because of its delivery style and precision in tighter contours. Reference: High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Wrinkles and Skin Laxity in Seven Different Facial Areas XERF: Uses RF energy to influence tightening and lifting through the fibrous septa that run between fat layers. EMFACE: Improves age-related muscle tone changes, helping shift soft tissue upward through muscle-based support. In the case referenced above, sagging outweighed hollowing—so improvement was achieved by combining CoolSoniq + XERF + EMFACE. Type 2. When Bone Resorption and Hollowing Are the Main Causes: Volumizing [Before and After Radiesse Treatment]Here, the key is rebuilding support by restoring volume where the structure has receded. Radiesse (CaHA): Calcium particles provide structural “framework” support and strongly stimulate collagen production. It can deliver both volumizing and firmness improvement. The outcome depends heavily on dilution strategy, which requires a high level of practitioner judgment. [Radiesse Before and After Treatment] Juvelook Volume (PDLLA): Often selected when you want to improve both cheek hollowness and nasolabial folds together. Reference: Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid Fillers Increase Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Volume by Promoting Adipogenesis in Aged Animal Skin Type 3. When Surface Creases Are the Main Concern: Skin Rebooting [Before and After Improvement of Elasticity in Nasolabial Folds and Corners of the Mouth]If the main problem is the “printed line” on the surface, you need shallow-layer support rather than deep volumizing alone. Re2O & CellREDM: Rebuild the skin matrix by injecting human-derived ECM or collagen directly, targeting the quality of the skin foundation. Thermage or Density (RF): Strong options when you want to improve not only smile lines, but overall elasticity and firmness across the face. Accurate Diagnosis Is Everything Because nasolabial folds are usually multi-factorial, the plan has to be layered. It’s not just “which device” or “which product.” It’s the dose, sequence, and timing—and how they interact on your specific anatomy. That level of planning comes from accumulated clinical insight, not just textbook theory. I strongly recommend building a long-term plan through a direct consultation with the treating physician. Closing Thoughts Nasolabial folds rarely resolve with a single filler injection. They usually require a true multi-layered approach that accounts for bone structure, fat descent, and skin thickness. I tell patients this often: “More filler is not the answer.” The most natural results come from restoring balance and anatomy—not forcing the fold flat through overcorrection. Instead of guessing, start with a precise diagnosis of what is actually driving your nasolabial folds. Sincerely, Dr. Do-hoon Kim, ODE ClinicGangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : Nasolabial FoldsAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.05Lifting
How Often Should You Get Ultherapy? The Practical Guide to Timing and Shot Counts
As dermatology clinics have become more accessible—and pricing has become more competitive—anti-aging treatments are now part of many people’s regular self-care routine.One of the questions I hear most often is:“How frequently should I do Ultherapy?”While the duration of the effect matters, the “right” interval is not one-size-fits-all. It depends on multiple variables, especially age and what you value most (cost-efficiency vs. maximum visible change).In this guide, I’ll explain Ultherapy’s theoretical vs. real-world maintenance window, and then outline how to choose an appropriate shot count and treatment cadence based on different needs.ODE UltherapyBefore and After Ultherapy TreatmentUpdated: April 6, 2026 By Dr. Do-hoon Kim, Chief Dermatologist at ODE ClinicUltherapy Maintenance: Theory vs. RealityThe Theoretical BackgroundDuring an Ultherapy session, ultrasound energy forms Thermal Coagulation Points (TCPs) in the deeper skin layers.This initiates a wound-healing cascade: fibroblasts become activated, collagen regeneration increases over roughly 1 to 3 months, and then the newly formed collagen fibers continue to interweave and mature as they strengthen.If we only look at this biological process on paper, Ultherapy results should persist for about 1 to 1.5 years.Yet in real practice, many patients feel they want follow-up earlier. Why?The Reality: 6 to 12 MonthsWith aging, collagen loss is continuous—and gravity never takes a break. So it helps to think of Ultherapy as a tug-of-war between the lift created by treatment and the ongoing force of natural aging.In many cases, after around the 6-month point, natural aging begins to outpace the remaining lifting effect, and the face slowly drifts back toward its baseline. On top of that, everyday factors—UV exposure, smoking, poor sleep, and stress—accelerate aging, which is why the practical maintenance period often lands closer to 6 months to 1 year.Factors That Determine Your Ultherapy IntervalWhen setting a schedule, I consider two factors especially important: Age Patient Goals: Cost-effectiveness vs. Maximum Results 1. AgeYounger patients generally have stronger collagen-regeneration capacity. That means even with the same baseline protocol (for example, 300 shots), younger individuals often see results that are both more noticeable and more durable compared to older patients.2. Cost-effectiveness vs. Maximum ResultsIf we were to visualize Ultherapy’s “effect vs. cost,” it would resemble a quadratic curve. Up to a certain point, increasing shots can raise satisfaction significantly. Beyond that point, the “extra benefit” gained per added cost starts to shrink.That’s why patients often fall into one of two mindsets: Value-Oriented: choosing a shot count and interval that delivers the best return for the investment Result-Oriented: prioritizing the strongest possible aesthetic outcome, even if it costs moreRecommended Ultherapy IntervalsGoalAge: 20s–40sAge: 50s and AboveValue (Cost-effective)Every 12 monthsEvery 9 monthsMaximum ResultsEvery 9 monthsEvery 6 monthsHow to Maximize Ultherapy ResultsIf repeating full Ultherapy sessions frequently feels burdensome, there are two strategies that can help extend and enhance results.1. The “Touch-up” MethodLet’s say a patient in their 50s truly needs 600 shots. Doing 600 shots every 6 months can be excessive in time and cost. In that situation, a more realistic plan can be: Start with a full 600-shot session At the 6-month mark, do a targeted 300-shot touch-up where improvement is most needed Then repeat the full 600-shot session 6 months after the touch-up 2. Combination Therapy (Multi-layer Lifting)Ultherapy mainly targets the 3.0mm and 4.5mm depths. If you combine it with other technologies that work through different mechanisms, you can reinforce multiple layers more comprehensively.Xerf (RF): radiofrequency tighteningOnda: microwave-based contouringEMFACE: muscle-layer targeting for structural supportIn my clinic, I often tell patients that rotating or combining mechanisms is usually more effective than repeating only one device indefinitely.Ultherapy: 300 Shots vs. 600 ShotsShot-count decisions are generally more straightforward: the more sagging there is, the more shots are needed. Within a certain range, higher shot counts usually translate into stronger visible change.A simple guideline is: Mild Sagging (20s–30s): 200 to 400 shots Moderate to Advanced Sagging (40s+): 300 to 600 shots Note: Final shot counts should still be adjusted based on the treatment area, skin thickness, and overall facial volume.Conclusion: Consult an ExpertRather than choosing your shot count or frequency on your own, it’s essential to find a clinic where you can have a true 1-on-1 consultation with the performing physician. A plan built around your anatomy and your current degree of laxity will always outperform a fixed template.And remember: “More” is not automatically “better.” The goal is to find the most efficient balance for your face and your priorities.I hope this helps you plan your Ultherapy journey with clarity and confidence.Best regards, Dr. Do-hoon Kim (ODE Clinic)Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : UltherapyAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.05Lifting
[2026 Guide] Ultherapy Reviews: Before & After, Cost, and How It Compares to Thermage
Even if you’ve never visited a Korean dermatology clinic, you’ve probably heard the name Ultherapy.It’s widely recognized as a flagship non-invasive lifting treatment—so much so that it has essentially become a synonym for “lifting” itself.If you’re considering your first session, this guide walks you through the essentials: what Ultherapy actually does, what “realistic” before-and-after changes look like, typical pricing, and how it differs from Thermage.ODE UltherapyLast Updated: April 6, 2026 By: Dr. Do-hoon Kim, ODE ClinicThe Science Behind Ultherapy: What It’s Actually DoingThe Core Mechanism: HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound)The term Ultherapy combines Ultrasound + Therapy.In other words, it’s a lifting device built around ultrasound technology.If you’ve had an abdominal ultrasound during a health check, you already understand the key advantage of ultrasound: it can travel through the skin and reach deeper structures without damaging the surface.Ultherapy uses that same property to deliver energy into deeper layers while keeping the outer skin intact.A helpful analogy is the classic magnifying glass experiment—focusing sunlight to burn a tiny spot on paper. Ultherapy does something similar: it concentrates ultrasound energy into thermal coagulation points (TCPs) that reach temperatures above 60°C.These points trigger immediate tissue contraction, and then stimulate long-term collagen production that firms the skin gradually.It’s Not Just “Pulling Up” — It’s More Like “Re-Setting” TissueMany people hear the word “lifting” and imagine the skin physically being pulled upward toward the ears.Ultherapy does not work like a mechanical pull.What it actually does is create controlled contraction so that sagging tissue shrinks and adheres, making the loosened contour look tighter and more compact.That’s also why Ultherapy doesn’t “replace volume.” If the main issue is hollowing, you typically still need a separate strategy for volume restoration.Best Areas for Ultherapy: Jawline or Smile Lines?If you look at an actual Ultherapy device screen, you’ll notice that most shots are concentrated around the jawline and double chin, not primarily along the nasolabial folds.You may also see red-marked regions over parts of the jawline where jowls sit—those are often treated cautiously or avoided because nerves pass through that zone.So practically speaking, Ultherapy tends to be a better fit for: Jawline definition Double chin contour improvement …rather than treating nasolabial folds or jowls as the main target.“Doctor, then what did those people get?”For patients whose priority is mid-face sagging or jowl lines, I often recommend combining other options such as CoolSonic, XERF, and EMFACE.I’ll break those combinations down more specifically in a separate post.Ultherapy vs. Thermage: Which One Makes Sense for You?Lifting vs. TighteningA simple way to frame the difference: Ultherapy = Lifting (Contour Improvement) It focuses on improving sagging by contracting and “resetting” deeper tissue for sharper facial lines. Thermage = Tightening (Texture Improvement) It focuses more on making skin look denser, smoother, and more elastic—helping it resist sagging over time. Before and After Thermage TreatmentThis is why Thermage before-and-after photos often show skin that looks more “snapped back” in texture, even when structural sagging such as jowls looks similar.FeatherUltherapy(Lifting)Thermage(Tightening)Primary GoalJawline Definition & ContouringSkin Elasticity & Anti-AgingEffectImproving "Sag" (Adhesion)Preventing "Sag" (Firming)Focus AreaDeep SMAS LayerSurface Dermis LayerIn short: they target different layers and different goals. That’s also why many patients choose the combined approach often referred to as “Ulthermage.”ODE ThermageUltherapy Before & After: When Results PeakCASE 1: Woman in her 40sProtocol: Ultherapy 400 shots Result: 7 months post-treatmentObservation: The heaviness of the jawline decreases noticeably, and the nasolabial folds/jowls can appear softer. While peak results typically appear around 2–3 months, this patient still maintained a firm contour even at the 7-month mark.CASE 2: Woman in her 60sProtocol: Ultherapy 400 shots Result: 5 months post-treatmentObservation: Even when sagging is more advanced, jawline definition can improve dramatically. This is one reason Ultherapy remains a strong option for mature skin—when performed with correct design and technique.Ultherapy Cost and PricingUltherapy is considered a premium device, and pricing reflects that. That said, many patients still choose it because one well-designed session can feel more cost-effective than repeating multiple lower-tier lifting treatments.ODE Clinic Ultherapy Pricing: Ultherapy 100 shots: 400,000 KRWNote: Exact needs vary by anatomy, but for visible, longer-lasting improvement, we generally recommend 300 to 600 shots depending on the area and degree of sagging.ConclusionToday, we covered what Ultherapy truly does, how it differs from Thermage, what before-and-after changes typically look like, and how to think about pricing.The most important step is not choosing a device first—it’s confirming whether the treatment matches your facial structure and goals. I strongly recommend a direct 1:1 consultation before committing to a plan.This has been Dr. Do-hoon Kim from ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : UltherapyAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.02Volume
Juvelook Volume: What It Really Feels Like — Pain, Swelling, and How Long It Lasts
Noticing your face looking a bit more hollow, but traditional fillers make you nervous?That’s exactly why many people start researching Juvelook Volume—and then immediately ask the same three questions:Is it painful?Will I swell a lot?Does it actually last?As someone who has performed this procedure on a large number of patients, I’m going to share the most honest, clinic-based answers—based on what I see in real life.ODE Juvelook VolumeJuvelook Volume Used at ODE ClinicPain Levels of Juvelook VolumePain is subjective, so it’s not realistic to label any treatment as “painful” or “painless” for everyone. What we can do is explain where the discomfort comes from and compare it to other common procedures.Juvelook Volume is typically delivered using a cannula—a blunt, flexible tube—so the product can be spread evenly across a broader area. To insert the cannula, we first make a tiny entry point and inject a small amount of lidocaine there.Most patients describe the sensation in two parts:First, a brief sharp sting from the lidocaine injection at the entry pointThen, a dull pressure / aching soreness as the cannula moves through the subcutaneous layer and the product is placedAt ODE Clinic, when patients rate it on a 0–10 scale, Juvelook Volume is most commonly described as around 6/10.To help you picture it, here’s how patients often compare it with other popular treatments:9+: Rejuran Healer7–8: Ultherapy, Thermage5–6: Juvelook Volume4 and below: Onda liftingNote: Pain tolerance varies widely, so treat this as a reference—not a guarantee.In general, Juvelook Volume is not considered “extreme” compared with other skin boosters or lifting devices, and the procedure itself is relatively quick—usually about 5 to 10 minutes. If a patient is especially sensitive, we can also add topical numbing cream beforehand.“Doctor, what about sleep anesthesia (sedation)?”I generally do not recommend sedation for Juvelook Volume. For the most natural result, assessment and placement should account for how tissue sits under gravity. If you are sedated, you are lying flat, which can make it harder to judge and target true hollow zones with the same precision.Swelling of Juvelook VolumeBecause Juvelook Volume is placed specifically into sunken areas, swelling—when it happens—usually resembles the direction of the final result. In fact, many patients say they actually like the early “fullness,” and it rarely interferes with normal daily life.What causes the swelling?Juvelook Volume comes as a freeze-dried powder and is reconstituted with saline. So the plump look immediately after treatment is mostly:saline volume, plusa small amount of fluid/exudate caused by cannula movementThis early swelling is typically absorbed within 2 to 3 days.Some patients worry that the effect “vanished” after a few days, but technically, the true collagen-stimulating phase hasn’t even started at that point.Longevity of Juvelook VolumeThe PDLLA (Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid) component of Juvelook Volume can remain in the body for roughly two years, and the collagen created through that process can persist even longer.So from a theoretical standpoint, Juvelook Volume is often described as a 2+ year treatment.Clinical RealityIn my clinical experience, most patients still maintain over 80% of their peak result even around the two-year mark after completing the initial series.Before: October 20231.5 Years Post-Treatment: May 2025 (significant volume retention observed)Recommended Treatment CycleBecause the longevity is relatively long, Juvelook Volume does not need frequent repetition.Here is the schedule I most commonly recommend:Initial volume building: 3 sessions, spaced 1 month apartMaintenance: a touch-up about once every 1.5 years“What if I’ve done 3 sessions but still want more volume?”My first advice is: wait. Collagen development takes time, and the “true” result continues to mature over months.If you still feel it’s not enough after 6 months, additional sessions can be considered. However, I personally believe that overdoing collagen stimulators can increase the chance of excessive fibrosis (tissue stiffness).So if hollow areas still remain after three consecutive Juvelook sessions, I often recommend finishing more softly with hyaluronic acid–based options such as fillers or HiloWave, depending on the area and the look you want.Note: Every face is different, so the safest path is always to finalize the plan through direct evaluation with your treating physician.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : Juvelook VolumeAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.02Volume
The Essential Guide to Juvelook Volume: Results, Costs, and How to Avoid Side Effects
Juvelook Volume is a procedure that uses a synthetic polymer called PDLLA to trigger collagen production—helping improve skin elasticity while also restoring volume in areas that look sunken. Drawing from my experience administering 5,000+ vials over several years, I will summarize Juvelook Volume’s real-world benefits, how to think about pricing, and the key strategies for preventing—and managing—nodule-related side effects in a clear, practical way.ODE Juvelook Volume The Principle of Juvelook Volume Juvelook Volume is formulated with PDLLA (a synthetic polymer) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA). PDLLA: Triggers an immune response that promotes collagen synthesis and adipocyte (fat cell) differentiation. Hyaluronic Acid (HA): Creates instant volume immediately after the procedure. Changes in adipose tissue thickness after Juvelook Volume (PDLLA) injection Source: Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid Fillers Increase Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Volume by Promoting Adipogenesis in Aged Animal Skin Juvelook Volume is typically used in facial areas where volume is lacking—most commonly nasolabial folds (smile lines) and hollow cheeks.Right after treatment, HA provides a short-term “boost,” and over time that temporary fullness is gradually replaced by your own natural tissue. Differences from Fillers Historically, the go-to option for filling sunken areas was Hyaluronic Acid (HA) fillers.The reasons were simple: HA is highly biocompatible and can be dissolved whenever needed. More recently, however, interest has grown in safer, longer-lasting alternatives due to concerns associated with fillers—such as vascular events, migration, or limitations in longevity. Juvelook Volume became widely popular in the Korean medical market because it addressed these demands at the right time. Unlike fillers, Juvelook Volume: Has almost no risk of vascular complications. Once volume is established, it rarely migrates and tends to last for a long time. Of course, there are downsides: The collagen created through Juvelook Volume cannot be dissolved, and the product is not ideal for precision contouring in areas like the forehead, nose, lips, or chin. In addition, because collagen response is difficult to predict, some patients may produce an excessive amount, which can lead to nodules as a side effect. To reduce this risk, treatment plans are often designed so collagen production remains slightly conservative. (This is one reason Juvelook Volume outcomes are frequently described as “natural.”) Conclusion: Both fillers and Juvelook Volume have strengths and limitations. The right choice depends on the area being treated, your individual condition, the speed and duration of results you want, and the risk profile you’re comfortable with. Juvelook Volume is not automatically “better” than fillers in every situation. Best Areas for Juvelook Volume The areas I most strongly recommend are broad cheek hollows and nasolabial folds. In particular, it tends to perform very well for hollow cheeks. Areas I do not recommend are the under-eyes and the front cheekbones (pre-malar area). Because the skin is thin in these regions, there is a higher chance the material may feel firm to the touch or look unnatural. For those areas, I recommend fillers instead. Juvelook Volume Nodule Side Effects What is a nodule? As explained above, it is extremely difficult to forecast exactly how much collagen will be produced.Even when the same technique is used, some individuals can develop an excessive immune response—leading to nodules, which are collagen clumps that may be visible or palpable. Nodules can appear within a few months, or they may show up much later—sometimes 1–2 years afterward.They can occur as isolated spots or appear in multiple areas across the treated region. The key is prevention. How to Prevent Nodule Side Effects I emphasize three core principles: (1) Single-Vial Use (One Vial per Person) Some clinics sell treatment by “cc” for segment-based pricing. When a single vial is reused multiple times, the risk of contamination and infection rises. If an infection develops at the injection site, the inflammation can accelerate collagen production—raising the likelihood of nodules. For this reason, I recommend using one full vial of Juvelook Volume exclusively for one patient. (2) Thorough Hydration (Reconstitution) Process Technically, the procedure can be performed after about 30 minutes of hydration. However, I personally believe that 24+ hours of hydration is preferable. Freeze-dried PDLLA particles must be fully reconstituted in saline so they can be injected evenly, reducing the risk of clumping inside tissue. (3) Proper Injection Technique Proper cannula technique, which disperses particles evenly across a wider area, is essential. That is why I recommend choosing experienced clinics rather than “factory-style” settings where many providers may still be early in their learning curve. Treatment and Prognosis of Nodules There are several possible approaches: Using energy-based treatments such as High-Frequency (RF) or ONDA to help break down and soften the area. Using 5-FU or steroid injections to calm inflammation and loosen fibrotic tissue. However, because Juvelook Volume has not been available for an extremely long time, there is still ongoing debate about exact prognosis, largely due to limited long-term data on nodule management. I explain to my patients: “If a nodule occurs, it may resolve naturally—or it may not. If it is not visibly noticeable, it’s often best to observe without immediate intervention. If treatment is necessary, most nodules gradually reduce in size with injections performed once every two weeks.” Juvelook Volume Pricing Pricing depends on many variables (region, clinic system, doctor experience, interior costs, and more), so it is difficult to define one universal “fair” price. That said, I do not believe it is wise to select only the cheapest clinic. Unlike Botox or standard skin boosters—where both effects and side effects are temporary—Juvelook Volume remains in the skin for years, and side effects can be more difficult to manage. Therefore, it’s best to choose a clinic with a stable system and extensive experience—without paying an excessively inflated premium.ODE Clinic Juvelook Volume CostJuvelook Volume (1 Vial) — 1 Session: 490,000 KRW Juvelook Volume (1 Vial) — 3 Sessions: 1,350,000 KRW Today, we took a deep dive into Juvelook Volume.When used appropriately, it can be an excellent option—but excessive treatment can lead to undesirable outcomes, so careful planning matters. Rather than worrying alone, I encourage you to visit a clinic where you can consult directly with an experienced director. This has been Dr. Do-hoon Kim of ODE Clinic.Gangnam Dermatology Clinic, ODE Clinic8th Floor, 340 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea+82–2–569–0222ODE Column : Juvelook VolumeAuthor: Dr. Dohoon Kim, Chief Director of ODE ClinicSpecialty: Anti-aging (Lifting, Volumizing, etc.)
2026.06.02Visit ODE CLINIC
Address
8F, Kyungwon Building, 340 Gangnam-daero, Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, South Korea
TEL
02-569-0222
Office Hours
Mon – Fri
AM 11:30 – PM 08:30
Sat – Sun
AM 10:00 – PM 04:00
* Open throughout the day without a lunch break.



